I have been asked to comment
on last week’s ASEAN foreign ministers’ meeting in Cambodia and its failure to
issue a joint communiqué, due to differences on how to address the South China
Sea/Spratly Islands issue.
First, this blog’s focus is
on the economic pillar of the ASEAN community, so I won’t comment directly on
the impasse, other than on how this reflects on ASEAN institutions (see next
point). For an excellent political
analysis, see Kavi Chongkittavorn’s take here.
Second, despite some
breathless reporting, the impasse does not represent the end of ASEAN. Yes, it was quite unfortunate that an ASEAN
foreign ministers’ meeting ended without a joint communiqué for the first time ever. Apparently this represents a clash between
the role of the ASEAN chair and ASEAN way of consensus. From an institutional point of view, perhaps
what happened was the best possible outcome, given the extreme differences
involved. In other words, a failure to reach
consensus – publicly explained by the participants in the transparent manner
that has happened since the meeting – could be viewed as preferable to a
watered-down communiqué, e.g., an agreement to do nothing. The
controversy may even force all sides to come together by the time of the ASEAN
Summit in November. Other areas of ASEAN decisionmaking would have
been improved by publicly acknowledging disagreement rather than issuing a weak
agreement that addresses nothing.
Third, diplomatic disputes
in Southeast Asia usually do not spill over into economic integration matters
on a permanent basis. Philippine
bananas may be a victim of the South China Sea dispute, but overall
economic forces should still foster cooperation. After all, at the same time China, Korea and
Japan are discussing a tri-lateral free trade agreement, the China-Japan
dispute over islands in the East China Sea. In fact, the AEC has been cited by Thailand as contributing to the withdrawal of troops from the Preah Vihear temple area this week:
(AFP PHOTO/KHEM SOVANNARA)
It's all too easy to forget how close Cambodia and Thailand were to armed conflict last year, and how Indonesia, empowered as ASEAN Chair by the ASEAN Charter, mediated a cease-fire.
(AFP PHOTO/KHEM SOVANNARA)
It's all too easy to forget how close Cambodia and Thailand were to armed conflict last year, and how Indonesia, empowered as ASEAN Chair by the ASEAN Charter, mediated a cease-fire.
If anything then, ASEAN
diplomats will busy over the next four months trying to avoid a similar impasse
at the ASEAN Summit in Cambodia. Indonesia is again moving in to bridge the differences. With no
one wanting a repeat performance with national leaders in attendance, I think
they’ll get the job done.